I have just been labelled a “religious Nazi”, had claimed I was “affiliated with a religious hate group”, and that “this scourge of religious freedom” (me) should be banned.
http://uk. answers. yahoo. com/question/index;_ylt=AkWmkiFpUGSB4AtKfghLutwgBgx. ?qid=20060625061002AAKDm4y
What do you think?
Which is using this site properly ,
A) Me criticising the Church of Scientology in an open questions forum with my opinion on the evidence providing links of my sources
B) Someone personally attacking me
OK so I admit, I’m subjective. I think scientology is a cult and I want others to be aware of the danger. Is that so bad?
http://www. xenu. net
Ok, Thanks for your responses.
It does seem people prefer the freedom to speak out for the things we believe in or indeed want to criticise.
I will think about the comments regarding my own conduct. However at present, I think the CofS is dangerous and would actually consider it irresponsible of me NOT to distribute my findings on the CofS. Yes, so I search for the topic I have a lot of knowledge on and want to inform people of the dangers so they can in turn make an informed decision on whether to join. This is my motive.
I do not see “vitriolic blathering” in this statement personally, but as said I will think about it. If I have ever personally insulted anyone with my criticisms I fully apologise and would retract those statements if possible. If I have simply posted information you don’t like, or an opinion you don’t agree with, then sorry, but this is my right and I will continue to do so.
Again thank you for your responses.
I also found this. . . kettle and black.
http://uk. answers. yahoo. com/question/index;_ylt=AkgneixTPXGVN53jihb2qN0gBgx. ?qid=20060616061804AAckJXq
Look for Foxtel’s answer.
Sorry Foxtail, If xenu. net was illegal it would be closed down. It does not host anything without evidence that is fully checkable by anyone. The web owner invites anyone to rebut what he has posted and he will remove it. You or any scientologists can do this.
I’m sorry we have met this way. I will continue to inform others about the church of scientology, but I understand that is not appropriate in discussion with you. I understand this now, but cannot avoid you seeing my answers to other people’s questions. I will not post questions about scientology, I haven’t done so yet.
I am always including links to the CofScientology in all my answers now, and am trying to quote facts and be more objective. I will work on this.
I have very clearly said in my question above that this is my opinion, therefore is one-sided by definition of the word.
Kathdes, that is wierd logic.
I wrote a whole long passage explaining why opinions are critical in this Q&A site but I think this highlights it nicely
Thank you for your opinion, but I don’t share it.
Affiliate Marketing Power Strategies Handbook
The complete guide will lead you through every step to becoming a super affiliate and start making money in less than 24 hours! You will have the opportunity to become an affiliate and earn 60% commission! Banners, Articles, Keywords and more supplied.
